Skip to content

Our Story

8 disputes. 8 industries. The same playbook every time. Built by someone who's been where you are.

I didn't set out to build EvenStance. I built it because I needed it.

My name's Dan. I'm not a lawyer, not a tech founder with a pitch deck, and definitely not someone who went looking for a fight. But over the past few years, I've found myself in 8 different consumer disputes across 8 different industries. Not because I'm difficult, but because companies kept getting things wrong, and I refused to just accept it.

Some of these disputes were for myself. Others were for a vulnerable person I'm deputy for, someone who can't advocate for themselves. Some of these stories are so shocking it's barely believable. But they're all real.

It started with a car.

A PCP deal with hidden commission. Thousands in interest I shouldn't have paid. When I raised it, the finance company denied everything. They sent template letters. They delayed. They hoped I'd go away.

I didn't go away.

Then came the new-build property with over 200 defects: structural issues, water coming in, incomplete work. A vulnerable person was living in conditions that weren't safe. The developer called them “snagging items” and sent contractors who made things worse.

Then an insurance claim that sat untouched for months. A telecom provider that kept overcharging. A retailer that refused to honour the Consumer Rights Act. An airline that lied about “extraordinary circumstances.” A care provider failing to meet basic standards. And then, almost unbelievably, the solicitors I'd paid to help with one of these cases turned out to be another problem entirely.

Eight disputes. Eight industries. Every single one of them used the same tactics.

Eight different disputes. Eight different industries. Eight different companies. And every single one of them used the exact same playbook.

They all used the same playbook.

Eight stages, every time. Once you see it, you can't unsee it.

Companies use this playbook to protect their own interests, often not from the right ground. It's a deliberate strategy, not incompetence. They made it hard on purpose because it's a winning strategy against most consumers.

1

Delay

Ignore your complaint for as long as possible. Make you chase. Hope you give up.

2

Deflect

Send generic template responses that don’t address your actual complaint. Pass you between departments.

3

The Fob Off

Dismiss your complaint with a carefully worded response designed to make you feel your case has no merit, when it often does. This is deliberate, not incompetent.

4

Divide

Make you repeat your story to a different person every time. No continuity. No accountability.

5

Deny

Reject your complaint on technical grounds. Claim you’re outside the window. Misquote their own terms.

6

Exhaust

Drag the process out for months. Bet that you’ll run out of energy before they run out of time.

7

Intimidate

Reference legal teams, threaten costs, use jargon designed to make you feel out of your depth.

8

Back Down

When none of it works, when you’ve kept records, cited the right legislation, and refused to quit, they run out of moves. They settle, comply, or fold. This is where you win.

The Fob Off: Their Most Effective Weapon

The fob off is the stage most people don't see for what it is. The company sends a carefully worded response that sounds authoritative and final, designed to make you believe your complaint has been properly considered and has no merit. In reality, it's often a template that doesn't address your specific points, cites irrelevant policy, or misrepresents the regulations. Most people read it, feel defeated, and give up. That's exactly what the company is counting on.

The moment it changed

Somewhere around dispute number three, something shifted. I stopped being reactive and started being systematic. I began keeping detailed records, not just of what happened, but of what they did: every delay, every deflection, every contradicted statement.

I learned which laws actually applied. Not from a textbook, but from reading FCA guidelines, ombudsman decisions, and court judgments. I learned that a Subject Access Request isn't just a formality. It's a weapon. I learned that citing specific regulations in your first letter changes the entire tone of the response.

I started winning. Not because I'm special, but because I found the pattern, and once you have the pattern, the playbook stops working.

I started winning. Not because I'm special, but because I found the pattern, and once you have the pattern, the playbook stops working.

When you win, and they still don't comply

Here's the part nobody tells you about. You've done everything right. You've gathered the evidence, written the letters, escalated to the ombudsman or regulator, and they've ruled in your favour. You've won.

Except the company still doesn't comply.

FOS awards that companies ignore. Ombudsman decisions that aren't implemented. Remediation programmes that stall. The enforcement gap is real, and it's a massive blind spot in consumer awareness.

What You Can Do When They Won't Comply

  • Court enforcement: FOS decisions are legally binding once accepted. You can register the decision as a County Court judgment and enforce it.
  • Regulatory complaints: Report the non-compliance to the FCA, Ofcom, Ofgem, or the relevant regulator. Companies that ignore ombudsman decisions face regulatory action.
  • Media and MP involvement: Consumer journalists and MPs can apply pressure that corporate complaints teams cannot ignore.
  • Bailiff enforcement: For court judgments, you can instruct bailiffs (enforcement agents) to collect the debt.

EvenStance guides you through the entire journey, not just the complaint, but the enforcement too.

So I built the system.

When I looked for tools to help people like me, regular people with legitimate complaints, I found almost nothing. There were template letter sites that hadn't been updated since 2015. There were forums full of conflicting advice. There were solicitors who'd charge you hundreds of pounds and then do less than you could have done yourself.

Nothing that actually walked you through the process. Nothing that understood the playbook these companies use and helped you counter it at every stage. Nothing that combined real knowledge of consumer law with practical, step-by-step guidance. Nothing that stayed with you when the regulator ruled in your favour but the company still didn't comply.

So I built it. EvenStance takes everything I learned: every tactic I encountered, every strategy that worked, every regulation that matters, and puts it into a system that anyone can use. AI-powered, but grounded in real experience. Not theoretical legal knowledge, but the practical reality of what actually happens when you take on a company and refuse to back down.

Why I'm offering it to you

Because I know what it feels like. The frustration of being ignored. The anger of being lied to. The exhaustion of fighting a system that's designed to wear you down. And the quiet satisfaction of winning anyway, not with threats or aggression, but with evidence, persistence, and knowing exactly where you stand.

Most people give up. Not because they're wrong, but because they don't know what to do next. They don't know which law applies, which regulator to contact, or how to write a letter that actually gets a result. They feel alone, overwhelmed, and outmatched.

You're not alone. And you're not outmatched. You just need the right tools.

Stand stronger.

The proof is in the outcomes.

Real disputes. Real companies. Real results. 8 cases across 8 industries. These are the disputes that built EvenStance.

Financial Services

Mercedes-Benz Financial Services

Won

The Problem

Hidden commission on a PCP agreement. Thousands overpaid in interest that was never disclosed.

Their Tactic

Denied the commission existed. Claimed the agreement was compliant. Refused to engage with specifics.

What Dan Did

SAR request exposed the exact commission figure. Cross-referenced FCA guidelines on disclosure. Built a timeline showing deliberate omission. Filed with the Financial Ombudsman with a fully evidenced dossier.

Result

Comprehensive win. Full commission refunded plus compensation.

Property Developer

New-Build Property

Won

The Problem

Over 200 defects in a new-build property. Structural issues, water ingress, incomplete finishes. A vulnerable adult was living in unsafe conditions.

Their Tactic

Claimed defects were “snagging” items. Sent contractors who made things worse. Refused to acknowledge structural problems.

What Dan Did

Documented every defect with photographs, expert reports, and building regulation references. Escalated through NHBC warranty, then directly to the developer’s board. Cited the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and building regulations.

Result

Developer agreed to comprehensive remediation programme. All structural defects addressed.

Insurance

Major UK Insurer

Won

The Problem

Valid insurance claim sat on for months. Policy documents withheld. No clear reason given for the delay.

Their Tactic

Claimed the documents had been sent. Blamed postal delays. Asked for information already provided. Classic stalling.

What Dan Did

Tracked every communication with dates and reference numbers. Filed a formal complaint citing FCA ICOBS rules on claims handling. Set explicit deadlines with regulatory consequences.

Result

Claim processed and paid. Additional compensation for unreasonable delay.

Legal Services

The Legal System Itself

Ongoing

The Problem

Solicitors instructed to help with one of these disputes failed to act competently. Missed deadlines, gave incorrect advice, and ultimately made the situation worse.

Their Tactic

Denied any error. Pointed to their terms of engagement. Suggested the outcome would have been the same regardless.

What Dan Did

Filed a complaint with the Legal Ombudsman. Documented every instance of negligence against SRA standards. The professionals who were supposed to help became another dispute to manage.

Result

This case proved the fundamental point: even when you pay for help, the system can still fail you. It’s why self-advocacy tools matter.

Telecommunications

Major UK Telecom Provider

Won

The Problem

Persistent billing errors and service outages. Promised broadband speeds never delivered. Repeated overcharging despite multiple complaints.

Their Tactic

Automated responses. No continuity between agents. Offered small credits instead of addressing the root issue. Blamed the infrastructure.

What Dan Did

Logged every outage with timestamps. Ran independent speed tests. Filed an Ofcom complaint after the 8-week deadline passed. Demanded a full SAR to expose internal notes.

Result

Full refund of overpayments. Released from contract without penalty. Compensation for service failures.

Consumer Goods

High-Street Retailer

Won

The Problem

Expensive goods developed a fault within 6 months. Retailer refused a refund, insisting on repair despite the fault being fundamental.

Their Tactic

Claimed the fault was caused by misuse. Offered a repair rather than refund. Ignored Consumer Rights Act requirements about burden of proof reversal.

What Dan Did

Cited CRA 2015 Section 19(14). Within 6 months the burden of proof is on the retailer. Obtained independent report confirming manufacturing defect. Sent LBA with 14-day deadline.

Result

Full refund processed. No court action needed. The LBA citing correct legislation was enough.

Travel

International Airline

Won

The Problem

Long-haul flight cancelled with less than 14 days notice. Airline refused EC 261 compensation, claiming extraordinary circumstances.

Their Tactic

Cited vague “operational reasons” as extraordinary circumstances. Delayed response for weeks. Offered rebooking but no compensation.

What Dan Did

Researched the specific flight: no severe weather, no ATC restrictions. The cancellation was due to crew scheduling. Filed EC 261 claim citing Wallentin-Hermann v Alitalia. Escalated to CEDR ADR.

Result

Full EC 261 compensation of £520 per passenger plus consequential losses.

Healthcare / Care Services

Care Provider

Won

The Problem

Inadequate care provision for a vulnerable person. Services not meeting the standard specified in the care plan. Failures documented over months.

Their Tactic

Deflected to local authority commissioning. Claimed staffing shortages. Disputed the documented care shortfalls despite evidence.

What Dan Did

Compiled detailed care logs, compared against the contractual care plan, and escalated through CQC and the local authority safeguarding team. Filed formal complaints citing Care Act 2014 duties.

Result

Care provision improved. Additional safeguarding measures implemented. Complaint upheld by local authority.

EvenStance

Ready to stand stronger?

You don't need a legal team. You need the right tools, the right knowledge, and the confidence to use them. EvenStance gives you all three.